06/04/21
π Activities π |
S.C.A.M.P.E.R |
Feasibility Analysis |
COW’s Matrix |
S.C.A.M.P.E.R
S = Substitute
C = Combine
A = Adapt
M = Modify
P = Put to another use
E = Eliminate
R = Reverse
Substitute: Substituting part of the problem/product/process for something else.
Example: Vegetarian hot dogs
Combine: Combining two or more parts of your probortunity (= merging of the word “problem” and “opportunity”) to achieve a different product/process or to enhance synergy. Example: Musical greeting cards
Adapt: Which parts of the problem/product/process could be adapted to remove the probortunity or think how you could change the nature of it.
Example: Snow tires
Modify: Changing part or all of the current situation, or to distort it in an unusual way. Example: All-you-can-eat restaurants
Put to Another Use: How you might be able to put your current solution/ product/process to other purposes, or think of what you could reuse from somewhere else in order to solve your own probortunity.
Example: De Beers put industrial diamonds to other use when they launched engagement rings.
Eliminate: What might happen if you eliminated various parts of the product/process/probortunity.
Example: Cordless telephone
Reverse: Think of what you would do if part of your probortunity/product/process worked in reverse or done in a different order.
Example: MacDonald’s rearranged the restaurant by getting customers to pay first and then eat.
---------------------------------ππππFeasibility Analysisππππ-----------------------------------
Idea : Heating pack (Substitute Calcium Oxide with Phosphorus pent-oxide with water in presence of calcium oxide and zeolite) | YES | NO |
Budget - Less than S$2000? | ✔ | |
Project Timeline - Can be completed within one semester? | ✔ | |
Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical feasibility of the project. | ✔ | |
· Is the project feasible within the limits of current technology? | ✔ | |
· Are the required utilities available? | ✔ |
|
· Does the lab have necessary testing and fabrication equipment? | TBC | TBC |
· Does it need any computer software and hardware? | | ╳ |
· Do we possess the necessary technical expertise and skills? | | ╳ |
· Does the lab have sufficient space to support the project? | ✔ | |
Operational Feasibility | | |
a. Does the project team have sufficient manpower to carry out the project? | ✔ | |
b. Is it legal to operate the project? | ✔ | |
c. Is it safe to operate the project? | ✔ | |
Idea : Sunlight using a concave mirror to reflect light | YES | NO |
Budget - Less than S$2000? | ✔ | |
Project Timeline - Can be completed within one semester? | ✔ | |
Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical feasibility of the project. | ✔ | |
· Is the project feasible within the limits of current technology? | ✔ | |
· Are the required utilities available? | ✔ | |
· Does the lab have necessary testing and fabrication equipment? | ✔ | |
· Does it need any computer software and hardware? | | |
· Do we possess the necessary technical expertise and skills? | | ╳ |
· Does the lab have sufficient space to support the project? | ✔ | |
Operational Feasibility | | |
d. Does the project team have sufficient manpower to carry out the project? | ✔ | |
e. Is it legal to operate the project? | ✔ | |
f. Is it safe to operate the project? | ✔ | |
Idea : Flameless Ration Heater (Substitute Magnesium-Iron Alloy with Zeolite) | YES | NO |
Budget - Less than S$2000? | ✔ | |
Project Timeline - Can be completed within one semester? | ✔ | |
Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical feasibility of the project. | ✔ | |
· Is the project feasible within the limits of current technology? | ✔ | |
· Are the required utilities available? | ✔ |
|
· Does the lab have necessary testing and fabrication equipment? | TBC | TBC |
· Does it need any computer software and hardware? | | ╳ |
· Do we possess the necessary technical expertise and skills? | | ╳ |
· Does the lab have sufficient space to support the project? | ✔ | |
Operational Feasibility | | |
g. Does the project team have sufficient manpower to carry out the project? | ✔ | |
h. Is it legal to operate the project? | ✔ | |
i. Is it safe to operate the project? | ✔ | |
--------------------------------------ππππCOWS Matrixππππ---------------------------------------
Table 1.1 Chemical Devices Property Selection Table
Criteria | Chemical Devices |
Heating Pack | Concave reflective mirror | Flameless Ration Heater |
Thermal Energy Produced | Heat of hydration calculated for zeolite 3A is 220 J/g. Q = mass x heat of hydration =1000g x 220J/g =220000J | A total power of 600 w is generated | 76.812W A survey of flameless heating mechanisms revealed that a water activated electrochemical pad, composed of magnesium-iron alloy dispersed in plastic powders, would most effectively heat an 8 ounce entree. The FRH was tested and evaluated extensively to determine its technical and operational capabilities. The FRH is capable of raising the temperature of an entree from 40 degrees F to 140 degrees F in 12 minutes or less. |
Portability | Heating pack is small and portable. | The parabolic cooker is somewhat portable. | Light weight |
Sustainability | Zeolite is also reusable. It can be dehydrated after use and thus can be activated again to make it reusable. | Solar cookers made up entirely of reused materials would have negligible environmental impacts and costs. It also reduces environmental impact by up to 65%. | It can pose certain fire, explosion, and health-related safety issues. |
Eco-friendly | Zeolite 3A is eco-friendly. Zeolite is completely recyclable.
| It is eco-friendly as there is no carbon emission. | It is eco-friendly. It is non-toxic. |
Table 1.2 Chemical Devices Selection Table
Criteria | Weightages | Chemical Devices |
Heating Pack | Concave Reflective Mirror | Flameless Ration Heater |
Thermal Energy Produced | 30% | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Portability | 20% | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Sustainability | 25% | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Eco-friendly | 25% | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Total | 100% | 255 | 205 | 140 |
In conclusion, we chose Heating Pack as our chemical device as it has the highest weightage for thermal energy produced and eco-friendliness out of the other 2 chemical devices. Even though Concave Reflective Mirrors have a higher weightage for sustainability, Heating Pack was still chosen over it as it has a better eco-friendliness as it is also important to take note of the impacts on the environment.
------------------------------------------------------------πΉReferencesπΉ----------------------------------------------------------
Flameless Ration Heater:
Oleksyk, L. E., Pickard, D., Trottier, R., & Army Natick Research Development And Engineering Center Ma. (n.d.). Development of the Flameless Ration Heater for the Meal, Ready-to-Eat. DTIC. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA265693.
Parabolic concave mirror Solar concentrator
Goswami, A., Basu, S., & Sadhu, P. K. (2019, August 7). Improvement of Energy Efficiency and Effectiveness of Cooking for Parabolic‐Type Solar Cooker Used with Activated‐Carbon‐Coated Aluminium Cooking Pot. Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/gch2.201900047.
Reflective Paint
“Introducing Solar Reflective Paint.” Promain Resource Centre, 19 July 2017, https://www.promain.co.uk/blog/solar-reflective-paint/.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/gch2.201900047
“Solar Cooker.” Wikipedia, 9 Mar. 2021. Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solar_cooker&oldid=1011256245.
-------------------------------------------------------π‘Group Reflectionπ‘---------------------------------------------------------
This week we learnt about S.C.A.M.P.E.R. With this method, we learnt that these questions help us to come up with creative ideas for developing new products, and for improving current ones. We also learnt something new and it's the feasibility analysis. We also had a good recap of the COW's Matrix as we had learnt it last year during our Materials Of Design Module. We hope that we will be available to learn more new things on the upcoming weeks.
No comments:
Post a Comment